Sarah Irving

I do things with words, mainly English and Arabic

The 3 Disappearances of Soad Hosni, Cornerhouse

Just returned from The Cornerhouse screening of The Three Disappearances of Soad Hosni, a film made by Lebanese director Rania Stephan, who was present for a post-screening Q&A.
Soad Hosni was an Egyptian actress who worked mainly from the 1950s to the 1970s, in her early career cranking out massive numbers of movies as part of the state-run film industry under Nasser, and then apparently – as Stephan put it – getting ‘more picky’ and working with more respected directors, including Yousef Chahine, later in her life. She died in 2001, after falling from a building on the Edgeware Road in London. Although her death was officially put down to suicide, it’s widely believed – especially in her home country – that the Egyptian secret services were involved.
I was really looking forward to this film, although I had pretty much no idea of what I was going to see. It was interesting, consisting entirely of cuttings from a large number of her films, assembled to create some kind of narrative or thematic progression. Some points worthy of mention might include:

— the (in some cases) spectacularly risqué costumes and amount of flesh on view, probably a considerable surprise to people with current stereotypes of ‘the Arab World’ (also the extent to which creating the ‘modern’ image of Egypt was apparently tied up with sexualisation and exploitation of the female body);
— the range of themes addressed even by this very popular medium, including mental health, rape, judicial corruption, polygamy and changing gender relations in 60s Egypt;
— the range of roles which Hosni herself took on, ranging from flirtatious comedy to dark, tragic parts.

However, although I felt like I ‘got’ a reasonable amount of the film, and it was obviously technically excellent and visually striking, with hindsight it’s hard to know how much that is actually owed to the Q&A afterwards, which rather raises the issue of what someone without that privilege would get from it. The film has, however, won at least one major prize and has attracted rave reviews like this, so maybe I should be feeling more enthusiastic.

The Q&A itself also raised a few issues. Some of the questions were interesting enough enquiries about the inspiration and process behind the film, although as is common with ‘arty’ screening some of them did descend into slightly cringemaking sycophancy.
But one question – by a man whose name I missed, if he gave it, but who introduced himself as a critic and as ‘an Arab’ (not more specific than that) – raised a bunch of issues. Part of the problem was that the question itself was poorly phrased and rambling – not really a question at all, but an invitation to comment, and not expressed (or by the look of it, understood) terribly well. The questioner summed up his point by saying that it was that ‘there was a conspiracy of art and politics against the man in the [Arab] street’. Actually, the rest of what he had to say made a more sense – that Soad Hosni was apparently used by the Egyptian secret services for much of her career; that the Egyptian film industry was dominated by the regime; that it was used to propagate certain ideas aimed at ‘modernising’ Egyptian society, especially (in this case) vis-a-vis women – but the summary rather killed much of that.
More disappointing, however, was the reaction of the chair – curator Omar Kholeif – and that of Stephan herself. You could literally see them stiffening up at the mention of politics. Perhaps they simply didn’t get the question, but if that was the case it may well have been partly because of the level of defensiveness that seemed to rigidify them before the questioner was half-done. And so the question was never answered. Stephan talked mainly about the fact that it wasn’t a biography of the ‘real’ Soad Hosni but of her image – which in a state-dominated film industry is surely the point? There was what seemed a terrifically naïve argument put forward that this was ‘art’ (and therefore entirely separate from politics?!). Kholeif argued, I think, that one can’t assume that messages put out in films are somehow blindly accepted by the public. True, but to go no further seems disingenuous. A pity.

Advertisements

2 comments on “The 3 Disappearances of Soad Hosni, Cornerhouse

  1. Sarah
    May 11, 2012

    And another take on the same evening, from local blogger Anthony Maxwell: http://anthonyjohnmaxwell.wordpress.com/2012/05/11/the-three-disappearances-of-soad-hosni/

  2. Omar Kholeif
    May 12, 2012

    Dear Sarah,

    Thank you for your thoughtful comments. I do however take some issue with some of them. The so-called individual who was commenting on the film, and your perception of the events that happened. The audience member who was commenting on the film was never asking a question, he himself noted that he was making a statement. He indeed was offered more time to speak than anybody else and in the respect of time and the right for as many people to be offered a chance to ask a question, we had to move on. There were many others who had different perspective and questions.

    Your interpretation that this individual was not offered the opportunity to express his opinion is completely misleading. Also, had anyone wished to carry on the conversation, we mentioned to join us afterwards — and indeed 15 people stayed to ask more questions and carry on the discussion.

    There was no so called defensiveness, and I have no problem talking about art and politics, indeed the entire exhibition Subversion aims to look at these very complexities. But Rania’s film isn’t a political statement. It was labour of personal of love to consider the performance and image of an icon through found VHS footage. The appropriation of art as a political statement by writers, curators and audiences for the sake of it is as constricting as any form of imperial colonialism of ideas– and every writer, artist or individual has the right and will to freely express what they believe to be or not to be their intention.

    I hope to see you again in the near future — and to have the opportunity to talk some more.
    Best

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: